Fury is set in 1945. It stars Brad Pitt as an army sergeant in command of a Sherman tank, stuck behind enemy lines with a five-person crew.
Their mission is to strike a strong blow right in the heart of of Nazi Germany... but did the film strike a positive chord with the film critics of America?
We run down their rants and raves below...
Fury is a brutal film that too easily celebrates rage and bloodshed to no clear end beyond ugly spectacle. - Tom Long
Attention to details give Fury heft and value, as does solid acting, but Ayer seems to lose his resolve in two scenes that are straight out of a Sgt. Fury Marvel Comics episode, or maybe a Hollywood script rewrite. - Peter Howell
Fury is a well-made, finely-acted movie that suffers only from being not particularly insightful or original. - Matthew DeKinder
The end result, while technically impressive, is a dramatically bloodless affair, despite the gallons of gore on display. - Peter Sobczynski
Fury is a thrilling and captivating project. Just when you think you've seen every possible staging of World War II, along comes a truly exceptional interpretation. - David Kaplan
Fury was one good casting decision away from being an Oscar winner, but it still might be a contender. - Willie Waffle
An undeniably impactful look at the horrors of war, as seen by the members of a divergent tank's crew during the closing days of World War 2. - John Hanlon
Elsewhere in the Pitt library, Fight Club came out 15 years ago this week. So...
... that we're free to do anything. Lose yourself in the simple profoundness of that one.
{ 0 komentar... read them below or add one }
Posting Komentar