Fury is set in 1945. It stars Brad Pitt as an army sergeant in command of a Sherman tank, stuck behind enemy lines with a five-person crew.
Their mission is to strike a strong blow right in the heart of of Nazi Germany... but did the film strike a positive chord with the film critics of America?
We run down their rants and raves below...
Fury is a brutal film that too easily celebrates rage and bloodshed to no clear end beyond ugly spectacle. - Tom Long
Attention to details give Fury heft and value, as does solid acting, but Ayer seems to lose his resolve in two scenes that are straight out of a Sgt. Fury Marvel Comics episode, or maybe a Hollywood script rewrite. - Peter Howell
Fury is a well-made, finely-acted movie that suffers only from being not particularly insightful or original. - Matthew DeKinder
The end result, while technically impressive, is a dramatically bloodless affair, despite the gallons of gore on display. - Peter Sobczynski
Fury is a thrilling and captivating project. Just when you think you've seen every possible staging of World War II, along comes a truly exceptional interpretation. - David Kaplan
Fury was one good casting decision away from being an Oscar winner, but it still might be a contender. - Willie Waffle
An undeniably impactful look at the horrors of war, as seen by the members of a divergent tank's crew during the closing days of World War 2. - John Hanlon
Elsewhere in the Pitt library, Fight Club came out 15 years ago this week. So...
{ 0 komentar... read them below or add one }
Posting Komentar